Tasmania - 19/11/10-23/12/12

Bedford-29 · Post by **Bedford-29** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:43 pm

280

Tas Bus Nut · Post by **Tas Bus Nut** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:02 pm

vernbale wrote:#315

Higher^^

Bedford-29 wrote:280

Higher^^ (originally Hobart based)

stevegj52 · Post by **stevegj52** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:05 pm

metro_tas · Post by **metro_tas** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:40 pm

number 214

yoda · Post by **yoda** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:07 pm

351 is a good number

vernbale · Post by **vernbale** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:08 pm

leyland clippers · Post by **leyland clippers** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:15 am

#320

Tas Bus Nut · Post by **Tas Bus Nut** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:57 pm

stevegj52 wrote:350

Higher^^

DVL wrote:number 214

Ummmm Not reading Higher^^

yoda wrote:351 is a good number

Still higher^^

vernbale wrote:#374

Yay!! A guess from a "Launcestonian". LOWER!!

leyland clippers wrote:#320

Higher^^

stevegj52 · Post by **stevegj52** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:59 pm

Tas Bus Nut · Post by **Tas Bus Nut** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:02 pm

stevegj52 wrote:360

Hi littl' Stevie. Higher^^ still

Bedford-29 · Post by **Bedford-29** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:02 pm

257

stevegj52 · Post by **stevegj52** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:19 pm

How bout 365

Tas Bus Nut · Post by **Tas Bus Nut** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:08 pm

Bedford-29 wrote:257

Higher^^

stevegj52 wrote:How bout 365

Lower!!

stevegj52 · Post by **stevegj52** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:12 pm

vernbale · Post by **vernbale** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:57 pm

#363

Tas Bus Nut · Post by **Tas Bus Nut** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:17 pm

stevegj52 wrote:362

vernbale wrote:#363

HIGHER^^

stevegj52 · Post by **stevegj52** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:15 pm

Well it would have to be 364

metro_tas · Post by **metro_tas** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:40 pm

do we actually know its "proper" number?

yoda · Post by **yoda** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:03 am

DVL wrote:do we actually know its "proper" number?

That was the point of guessing

Tas Bus Nut wrote:SUCCESS!!! Many thanks to Ian Cooper & Ken Flood for their time & patience in uncovering the ORIGINAL # of THIS 1966 CBW SB Bedford.
SO, since I KNOW, but nobody else does What was the ORIGINAL # of this LAUNCESTON CBW SB Bedford

Bedford-29 · Post by **Bedford-29** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:01 am

And it could of been BF-2051

.

metro_tas · Post by **metro_tas** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:32 am

I obviously can't read!

Tas Bus Nut · Post by **Tas Bus Nut** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:04 pm

stevegj52 wrote:Well it would have to be 364

Correct Steve!! Higgins CBW Bedford is ex MTT L'ton #364

stevegj52 · Post by **stevegj52** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:42 pm

Nothing suitable to put up, so the floor is open to anyone.

leyland clippers · Post by **leyland clippers** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 7:02 am

What is the # of this VOV Mk 2

: MET ?; phpWNANlHAM.jpg (48.8 KiB) Viewed 4428 times

Tasmania - 19/11/10-23/12/12

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania

Re: Which Vehicle Is It - Tasmania