WA Transport Questions thread

Perth / Western Australia Transport Discussion

Moderators: perthbus, Mr OC Benz

perthbus
Moderator
Posts: 763
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 1:54 pm

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by perthbus »

It depends greatly on service requirements, replacing write offs both accidents and mechanical failures, % of non accessible buses in fleet...a large number of Renaults have been withdrawn over the past few months.

User avatar
User 11872
Posts: 905
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:40 am
Favourite Vehicle: Worldmaster-Leopard-Veyron

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by User 11872 »

Will Welshpool be receiving any new diesels or is this primarily to remain a gas depot?

User avatar
Mr OC Benz
Moderator
Posts: 5729
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:18 am
Favourite Vehicle: Anything German
Location: Sydney, NSW
Contact:

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by Mr OC Benz »

Depends on what expansion if any that may necessitate having additional buses, and those that need to be replaced it may work better to continue sending the new ones to Kalamunda then transferring the NHs etc to Welshpool. Not primarily based on the fuel type availability as depots such as Malaga and Palmyra which have CNG facilities are still also getting new diesel buses too.

102 at 1625
Posts: 308
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:06 am
Favourite Vehicle: Volgren Optimus
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by 102 at 1625 »

I was wondering if a somebody could answer a few burning questions for me...
  1. How do the various bus companies bill the PTA for their work. Is might be by service km, but then why does the PTA bother to have bus services depart at strange times (like :02), especially on weekends when they have spare buses, as they wont get billed for requiring more drivers. Is it by service minutes, but doesn't driving a bus at high speeds require more fuel (and therefore more cost) than driving at low speeds? Is it by actual minutes (from when the driver signs on to when the signs off, to make allowance for delays)? Does it include non-service (000) minutes? Is it a combination of those options? Or is the PTA billed some other way?
  2. How does the PTA timetable exact bus departure times to maximise efficiency (i.e. :01 or :02 etc). I would assume some computer software is used. How was it done before computers?
  3. What happened to the TransRegional brand and the proposed website?
  4. What's this? It actually looks...good!

User avatar
Mr OC Benz
Moderator
Posts: 5729
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:18 am
Favourite Vehicle: Anything German
Location: Sydney, NSW
Contact:

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by Mr OC Benz »

1. Doesn't work like that. PTA pay the contractors (in this case bus operators) on a per kilometre basis. Reading publicly available tender documents on the provision of bus services that appear on the Tendsrs WA website from time to time is a good way, if you're interested to get a better understanding of how it works behind the scenes.
2. The departure times can be related to a number of factors.
- Journey time
- Any potential coordinated frequency with another route to try and even out the intervals
- Maximising efficiency (i.e. the possibility that you can save one bus and the costs associated by having the bus depart at :01 or :02 rather than at :00 etc)
- To a smaller extent, bus terminus capacity (e.g. Rather than having 20 different bus services departing the Busport at the same time, staggering them would enable better use of the facilities and bus stands/layover as well as improve reliability if you don't have 20 different buses racing each other out of the Busport through the green light at the same time
3. Seems to be delayed... again, or potentially integrated with point 4 below.
4. New Transperth website as a BETA version at the moment. It does look good and definitely a lot of improvements and advancements by the looks of it. Will be good once it is fully implemented.

laptop15
Posts: 1064
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:46 pm
Location: Landsdale

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by laptop15 »

Thanks so much for that! How did you find it? I think its brilliant! However I would like to see more info put on the visitors to Perth and regional services pages (though I know its sill beta)

User avatar
User 11872
Posts: 905
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:40 am
Favourite Vehicle: Worldmaster-Leopard-Veyron

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by User 11872 »

Great improvement - I like it!

JC2314
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:54 pm
Favourite Vehicle: TP-1441 and 2314!

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by JC2314 »

It's what Transperth need! It also explains how fares and zones work with examples, good for those new to the system!

User avatar
mrobsessed
Posts: 1934
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 11:31 am
Favourite Vehicle: AEC Reliance
Location: Perth WA
Contact:

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by mrobsessed »

The Transperth app is good also.

User avatar
actually
Posts: 1333
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: In front of my iPad air

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by actually »

I think the 2 section fare should only apply when using a smart rider. The minimum cash fare should be a 1 zone ticket.
Proudly having drivin PATH Transit buses (fulltime) from 23/09/1996 to 11/05/12.
Back sniffing fumes.



-----its not a train set, its a model railway-----

User avatar
Mr OC Benz
Moderator
Posts: 5729
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:18 am
Favourite Vehicle: Anything German
Location: Sydney, NSW
Contact:

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by Mr OC Benz »

I disagree. The two-section fare is good because it covers the disadvantages of Zonal fare structures where you are disadvantaged just because you live just outside the border of Zone 1 for example. So rather than paying for a 2 Zone ticket to travel a short distance which happens to cross the zone boundary, the two-section fare covers this loophole as such, whereas other cities do not have this concept and passengers are more or less penalised just because the radius of a zone puts them just outside a boundary. It evens out the system and fare paying passengers somewhat. But I do agree that it could be named something else as irregular users or visitors to Perth can get confused by the two-section and 2 Zone fare which are two completely different tickets. If the two-section fare was removed, many people would probably have to pay a 2 zone fare rather than a 1 zone fare just to travel a short distance if they happen to be near a Zone boundary, hardly fair to the customer.

One thing I don't understand is why the Concession Smartrider has a cap at the Dayrider rate while the Standard Smartrider doesn't seem to?

User avatar
actually
Posts: 1333
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: In front of my iPad air

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by actually »

I didn't say it shouldn't exist but it should only apply when using a smart rider....just my opion.
Proudly having drivin PATH Transit buses (fulltime) from 23/09/1996 to 11/05/12.
Back sniffing fumes.



-----its not a train set, its a model railway-----

User avatar
tbc1983
Posts: 1592
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:27 am

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by tbc1983 »

^^^Wasn't there a 1 section fare back in the '90s?

Cheers!
Death is the solution to all problems. No man - no problem.

User avatar
User 11872
Posts: 905
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:40 am
Favourite Vehicle: Worldmaster-Leopard-Veyron

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by User 11872 »

No 1983!
The two-section fare is definitely warranted as per benz's points above. Also BD12...agreed wholeheartedly although "nomenclature" - please....terminology did the job lol.
In London they used to simply call it a "short hop" fare, whatever the predetermined distance was.

User avatar
User 11872
Posts: 905
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:40 am
Favourite Vehicle: Worldmaster-Leopard-Veyron

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by User 11872 »

I had similar problems when young - even had my family get written confirmation of the 2-section fare I was entitled to, and after seeing it (every evening I travelled home same time/route) he still argued.
I really wonder if some of these drivers sleep well at night with all their stress-inducing pedantic knit-picking. I personally wouldn't give one f*ck even if I was wrong lol

102 at 1625
Posts: 308
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:06 am
Favourite Vehicle: Volgren Optimus
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by 102 at 1625 »

I wrote:What happened to the TransRegional brand and the proposed website?
I seem to have answered my own question by finding this. It explains the blue colour of the new TransRegional timetables. Also, this page suggests that there are 3 town bus routes around Carnarvon. Does anyone know anything more about these services?

User avatar
User 11872
Posts: 905
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:40 am
Favourite Vehicle: Worldmaster-Leopard-Veyron

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by User 11872 »

I like the branding but the functionality needs work.

User avatar
timetable gunzel
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 1:29 pm
Location: Wynyard Tram Terminus

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by timetable gunzel »

Can anyone tell me if the current Route 200 Cannington to Booragoon is a re-numbering of a previous Route. If it is not, when did the existing 200 commence?

User avatar
Mr OC Benz
Moderator
Posts: 5729
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:18 am
Favourite Vehicle: Anything German
Location: Sydney, NSW
Contact:

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by Mr OC Benz »

Remember its still in BETA stage.

Route 200 was formerly Route 205 and was renumbered fairly recently.

User avatar
timetable gunzel
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 1:29 pm
Location: Wynyard Tram Terminus

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by timetable gunzel »

Gents,

Thanks for the Route 200 info.

the c man
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:03 am

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by the c man »

Since most buses in the transperth fleet and the new b set are 4 digits, should all a series trains have 4 digits so instead of 301/201 it will be 3001/2001 to be in line with most buses and all new b sets???

User avatar
Mr OC Benz
Moderator
Posts: 5729
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:18 am
Favourite Vehicle: Anything German
Location: Sydney, NSW
Contact:

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by Mr OC Benz »

Not all buses are four digits and certainly doesn't look to be that way given random fleet acquisitions which now have buses numbered with UQB and three digit fleet numbers (e.g TransRegional acquisitions). Trains is just a continuation and I don't necessarily think adding a four digit to the existing fleet is necessary right now, but perhaps they will do this over time...

User avatar
User 11872
Posts: 905
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:40 am
Favourite Vehicle: Worldmaster-Leopard-Veyron

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by User 11872 »

There's 4-digit Reno's even

pasha241
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 8:47 am

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by pasha241 »

can anyone tell me is most of non accessible bus/old bus is not doing any route service on weekends. because today i went to city and Mirrabooka today. i don't see any Renault, O405 CNG and other old bus.
list of my photo taken you can be found at https://busenthusiastic.wordpress.com/

perthbus
Moderator
Posts: 763
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 1:54 pm

Re: WA Transport Questions thread

Post by perthbus »

pasha241 wrote:can anyone tell me is most of non accessible bus/old bus is not doing any route service on weekends. because today i went to city and Mirrabooka today. i don't see any Renault, O405 CNG and other old bus.
Good, they should be all parked up in the depot on weekends and after 8pm weekdays.

Locked

Return to “Discussion - Perth / WA”