98 confused with 906 rail replacement
Moderators: perthbus, Mr OC Benz
- <smarTTrams>
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:28 am
- Location: Capital of Australia's Western Third Avatar: Train Pictogram
98 confused with 906 rail replacement
Whenever the Fremantle line closes, I go to Fremantle by Circleroute if possible, to avoid being crammed into one linc bus (used to replace a 4-car train) which doesn't depart Fremantle Interchange until it is completely full.
On Sunday 11.02.07 the Route 98 ex Fremantle at 1640 hours was hailed at almost every stop that it shares with Route 906 (and some that it doesn't share) along Stirling Highway by people wanting to know if it was the rail-replacement bus!!
This didn't happen when the rail replacement buses were numbered 606.
Did this trip just happen to strike a higher than average number of passengers with lower than average numeracy skills, or are these new route numbers (904, 905, 906, 907) more confusing than the old 404, 505, 606, 707 because there are also routes 95, 97, 98 and 99 (which are sometimes displayed as 095, 097, 098 and 099, although not in the case of the bus I was on) and, of course, Route 920.
All the stops shared by 98 and 906 had the new rail replacement numbers in large white letters on a red background, and STILL they got it wrong and slowed us down by at least 5 minutes between Fremantle and Claremont!
<smarTTrams> ... coming ... <smarTTrams> ... going ...<smarTTrams>
On Sunday 11.02.07 the Route 98 ex Fremantle at 1640 hours was hailed at almost every stop that it shares with Route 906 (and some that it doesn't share) along Stirling Highway by people wanting to know if it was the rail-replacement bus!!
This didn't happen when the rail replacement buses were numbered 606.
Did this trip just happen to strike a higher than average number of passengers with lower than average numeracy skills, or are these new route numbers (904, 905, 906, 907) more confusing than the old 404, 505, 606, 707 because there are also routes 95, 97, 98 and 99 (which are sometimes displayed as 095, 097, 098 and 099, although not in the case of the bus I was on) and, of course, Route 920.
All the stops shared by 98 and 906 had the new rail replacement numbers in large white letters on a red background, and STILL they got it wrong and slowed us down by at least 5 minutes between Fremantle and Claremont!
<smarTTrams> ... coming ... <smarTTrams> ... going ...<smarTTrams>
- <smarTTrams>
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:28 am
- Location: Capital of Australia's Western Third Avatar: Train Pictogram
- J1 Rasberrycoke (J1R)
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:56 pm
- Location: Nightmoves
I noticed whilst at Perth in november that some of the bus stops at train station interchanges meant diddly squat, i.e. cannington where the train sub stop is way down the interchange a fair distance, i waited there but most of the passengers wait at the escalators for the station and that is where the maxi taxi picks up and sets down, why not just put the sub bus sign there, that is where everyone waits XD
First ever passenger on J1 J1C 265 T217 RZ6 RZ8 N224 N122 521 522 173 E1 N206
Last ever passenger 112 124 T255 236 266 282 402 420
on first RZ5
on last 275
Last ever passenger 112 124 T255 236 266 282 402 420
on first RZ5
on last 275
Actually I have a better idea. How about we teach people to read.
I love watching people get on my bus when I have LAST STOP in big writing on, and they all race to get on. I have learnt that it's better to just let everyone on then stand up and explain that this bus terminates here. If I try to close the doors then they try to smash them down by hitting them or punching them and getting aggressive.
I love watching people get on my bus when I have LAST STOP in big writing on, and they all race to get on. I have learnt that it's better to just let everyone on then stand up and explain that this bus terminates here. If I try to close the doors then they try to smash them down by hitting them or punching them and getting aggressive.
Bus desto: PERTH, WELLINGTON ST, 220, WSBSz80 wrote:Actually I have a better idea. How about we teach people to read.
Passenger: Does this bus go to the busport?
It's a bit like when you're driving a truck and you have 'GOLDEN EGGS' emblazoned on your sides and doors and you will still get the odd king ding-a-ling that'll ask ya "Wotcha carrying driver?" and then you'll reply in a gruff tone "Beetroot!"
Cheers!
ATDB member's quotes are now on holiday.
Looks like Herbert's H.D. will have to do 'a phoenix'!
Looks like Herbert's H.D. will have to do 'a phoenix'!
LMAO, ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer!z80 wrote:I was doing a 102F to Cottelsoe with the large COTTESLOE display set, and a customer stopped the bus, and asked, Does this bus go to Cottesloe. For the sake of behavioural science I said No, then the passenger then told me that my display said I was and immediately got on my bus and sat down.
It makes you wonder why the hell they asked that bloody question!
"Nah, I'm not going to Cottesloe, I just fkn felt like displaying it!"
Cheers!
ATDB member's quotes are now on holiday.
Looks like Herbert's H.D. will have to do 'a phoenix'!
Looks like Herbert's H.D. will have to do 'a phoenix'!
For the most part, they used to be. They were red sticks in the ground instead of orange and they were located between regular stops. (Cottesloe a good example). There never seemed to be a problem in the past, but the oh-so-know-it-all-smart-arses just have to change everything for their own intellectual benefit.z80 wrote:The rail stops should be in different locations with different bus stop polls.
Ah, the world alas....it is a sinking.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:03 pm
- Location: Near Kings Park
- VolgrenL94UB
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 1:09 am
- Location: Perth