Hello,
Just wondering, why have the recent bus deliveries for Operators like Dysons, Sita, etc. have to be in PTV livery, I haven’t heard of New Contracts and Routes yet...but still have no idea why these recent bus have to be in the livery rather than the operators livery???
All new Route buses to be In PTV livery in Melbourne
Moderator: MAN 16.242
Forum rules
### This section is a NO FLAMING ZONE! That means you cannot reply "harshly", abusively, sarcastically or in any negative manner to members. ###
### This section is a NO FLAMING ZONE! That means you cannot reply "harshly", abusively, sarcastically or in any negative manner to members. ###
- MotorOmnibus8562
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:34 am
- Favourite Vehicle: Hybrid/Electric lowfloors.
- Location: Wodonga - Onboard some gooold
All new Route buses to be In PTV livery in Melbourne
Only Stupid people invented vapes.
Betting ads are pests
Corn, Corn, Corn, Corn, Corn, A post on this thread, corn
Dyson's #463 - Beast!
Betting ads are pests
Corn, Corn, Corn, Corn, Corn, A post on this thread, corn
Dyson's #463 - Beast!
- Mitch
- Posts: 1966
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:32 pm
- Favourite Vehicle: VH-VUB
- Location: Geelong
- Contact:
Re: All new Route buses to be In PTV livery in Melbourne
As far as I'm aware, the reasoning behind it being in the PTV livery is that if the vehicle was funded/leased by the government to the operator so that they can operate routes under their contract, then it has to be in the PTV livery. If the vehicle was self funded by the company itself, then it can be in the company's colours. McHarry's in Geelong is an example of ongoing deliveries in the standard McHarry's livery as the vehicles are purchased by the McHarry family directly.
I'm open to correction if I'm wrong though.
Regards,
Mitch
I'm open to correction if I'm wrong though.
Regards,
Mitch