Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Sydney / New South Wales Transport Discussion
User avatar
pgt
Posts: 1044
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:05 am
Favourite Vehicle: MAN SL202/MB O305G/Volvo B10M
Location: Now deep in STA territory
Contact:

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by pgt »

burrumbus wrote:
Campbelltown busboy wrote:Cut the 959 and run the Bald Face loop as a part of the 970 in both directions
The 959 Bald Face loop is actually quite well patronised,especially at peak hour.It deserves its place as a separate and distinct service.
By combining it with 970/971 would considerably lengthen trip times .12-14 minutes on average.Although the vast bulk of the 970/971 patronage is generated from Hurstville-Tom Ugly's Bridge.
In days gone by when John O'Nains operated the 959 under the Carss Park Bus Service trading name the 959 generated peak hour loadings of 25-40 pax per trip.Very impressive figures for a short route.He operated it on 30 minute peak/60 minute peak frequencies.He had very friendly ,customer focussed drivers which were key in the pax figures.
Under Southtrans/Veolia/Transdev ownership it has dropped away from those figures but it is still well patronised.15-20 pax average.
I used to live on the 959 loop route and agree with what burrumbus is saying.

When the operator was branded Connex (a name not mentioned yet), they tried merging the off peak and Saturday services with the then-hourly 971 (which ran in the reverse direction through the loop), and oddly tried to introduce Sunday service through Bald Face loop by merging it with route 970 [as they had that short-lived "Connextor" route which basically merged the 971, the then 948 and 962] - don't recall it doing that well overall [especially for running times], as they split it back into individual routes and dropped the Sunday service through Bald Face since then.

I believe another issue with trying to merge the 959 was at the Blakehurst Shops end - when running the route clockwise, there would be stops that are missed which the normal 959 route would stop at, plus the missed stops on the Princes Highway (they were trying to keep a consistent 15 minute frequency Sylvania Southgate to Hurstville, and diverting even one of the two 970 or 971 buses would throw this out quite badly).
"It's my way or the (side of the) highway".
Might be a way to lead life, but more like the way that some people drive.

User avatar
Campbelltown busboy
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:23 am
Location: Ruse/Campbelltown City NSW

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Campbelltown busboy »

The T80 should be renumbered to B2 or any number in the 824-834 range
1000 posts and counting
1st post Sun Aug 11 2013 8:04pm
1000th post Sun Dec 15 2019 4:30pm

User avatar
Richard290
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:39 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Volvo B8RLE Volgren Optimus
Location: Carlingford, NSW
Contact:

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Richard290 »

830 seems a reasonable candidate if T80 is ever renumbered in the similar way that T70-75 were renumbered 730-735 in May. 800, 810, 820, 840, 850, 870, 880 and 890 are all in use for other routes.
Living at the north end of the 513 & 535. and the confluence of 513, 535, 546, 549, 550, 553, 625 & 630.

User avatar
Campbelltown busboy
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:23 am
Location: Ruse/Campbelltown City NSW

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Campbelltown busboy »

Richard290 wrote:830 seems a reasonable candidate if T80 is ever renumbered in the similar way that T70-75 were renumbered 730-735 in May. 800, 810, 820, 840, 850, 870, 880 and 890 are all in use for other routes.
840,850 and 870 are region 2 routes and 880 and 890 are long time region 15 routes with the 890 dating back to 1985 with Campbelltown Transit giving 890 to the unaltered Campbelltown-Appin run from 1925 system route 93
1000 posts and counting
1st post Sun Aug 11 2013 8:04pm
1000th post Sun Dec 15 2019 4:30pm

User avatar
Campbelltown busboy
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:23 am
Location: Ruse/Campbelltown City NSW

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Campbelltown busboy »

Will Transdev need to renumber their metrobus routes anytime soon and if that happens what would the numbers be I'm thinking that Transport For NSW will give permission for Transdev to renumber the Parramatta loop shuttle and transfer the M90 back to route 900 then there are the other 2 that can be renumbered with any free route number combos in the 9xx series of route numbers
1000 posts and counting
1st post Sun Aug 11 2013 8:04pm
1000th post Sun Dec 15 2019 4:30pm

User avatar
rogf24
Posts: 1110
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 6:20 am

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by rogf24 »

If you're going for a B renumbering of T80, wouldn't B8 make more sense?

As for M9x, renumbering is inevitable, but please, I would like to see later services.

User avatar
Richard290
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:39 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Volvo B8RLE Volgren Optimus
Location: Carlingford, NSW
Contact:

Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Richard290 »

The Parramatta-Bankstown via South Granville section of current route M91 was originally 910 prior to February 2011, with the route being merged with the Bankstown-Hurstville 948 to form the current M91. I wouldn’t be surprised if the whole route would revert back to 910 come the eventual opening of the Bankstown Metro.
As for M92, it could be renumbered 920 as the number 920 is currently unused.
Living at the north end of the 513 & 535. and the confluence of 513, 535, 546, 549, 550, 553, 625 & 630.

User avatar
boronia
Posts: 19453
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 7:18 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Fire engine; PD4107
Location: Sydney

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by boronia »

The original Metrobus routes were 10, 20, 30 etc (no M prefix).

Why can't they revert back to this system? M91 becomes just 91?
The Sydney Classic and Antique Truck (and Bus) Show
On again June 2021
@ The Museum of Fire.

User avatar
swtt
Posts: 5365
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:49 am

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by swtt »

boronia wrote:The original Metrobus routes were 10, 20, 30 etc (no M prefix).

Why can't they revert back to this system? M91 becomes just 91?
m41 should've then just been "41" :P

User avatar
Campbelltown busboy
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:23 am
Location: Ruse/Campbelltown City NSW

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Campbelltown busboy »

swtt wrote:
boronia wrote:The original Metrobus routes were 10, 20, 30 etc (no M prefix).

Why can't they revert back to this system? M91 becomes just 91?
m41 should've then just been "41" :P
Well this would have been the same for the M60
1000 posts and counting
1st post Sun Aug 11 2013 8:04pm
1000th post Sun Dec 15 2019 4:30pm

User avatar
Fleet Lists
Administrator
Posts: 21535
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Shire

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Fleet Lists »

Would be against the three digit route number structure used in Sydney.
Living in the Shire.

iamthouth
Posts: 366
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:38 am

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by iamthouth »

Two digit numbers are used in the Outer Metro and Rural/Regional routes, but three digit for Sydney metro.

User avatar
Campbelltown busboy
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:23 am
Location: Ruse/Campbelltown City NSW

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Campbelltown busboy »

My original reply on this issue was a question about what would happen when Transport For NSW eventually tells Transdev to renumber metrobus routes M90,M91 and M92
1000 posts and counting
1st post Sun Aug 11 2013 8:04pm
1000th post Sun Dec 15 2019 4:30pm

User avatar
Fleet Lists
Administrator
Posts: 21535
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Shire

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by Fleet Lists »

I think that has been truely answered.
Living in the Shire.

moa999
Posts: 2558
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:12 am

Re: Remnant routes that can be rationalised

Post by moa999 »

Contract is pretty clear. "Yes Master"

Post Reply

Return to “Discussion - Sydney / NSW”