New incident rule proposal

News and comments about this board.
Post Reply
member 1423
Posts: 3931
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 6:44 am

New incident rule proposal

Post by member 1423 »

I think it would be a good idea to adopt a thread locking policy on incidents like Railpage does. Just looking at a recent thread in QLD that was locked on request, I thought it may be an idea just to lock all incidents?

What does everyone else think?

User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
Posts: 6960
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 7:02 am
Location: The People's Republic of Campbelltown

Post by Andrew »

What is an 'incident'?
.
Job done.

User avatar
Volvo B12BLEA
Posts: 4721
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:23 am
Favourite Vehicle: Rail and Ships / Boats.
Location: Brisbane but prefer Adelaide.

Post by Volvo B12BLEA »

This would be a good idea.


It stops people from posting un-necessary posts about the incident.
Although I posted to the thread Mbrowne1045 is referring to, my posts said what happened then I posted Condolances.

I sent a message to T1200, the Brisbane section Moderator, asking for the thread to be locked.
T1200 replied rather swiftly by locking it when he had read my message.


I have seen posts about incidents especially fatal ones, turn into "slanging matches" that only end up causing more grief.

We dont' know if anybody from the victims family reads the board or not. If they did, imagine them reading posts about how the incident may or may not have occured.
Put yourself in their "shoes".
Any posts are my views or opinions and are NOT on behalf of any Organisation.

User avatar
T1200
Administrator
Posts: 3860
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:42 am
Favourite Vehicle: MAN 18.310 CNG Volgren CR228L
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by T1200 »

What thread? The Cleveland line one? Therefore you are deeming an incident as something that has happened and has been reported on the site?

I think it's best to play it by ear, too many rules will ruin any atmostphere this board may or may not have :P

EDIT: Can't wait for the new version of the software, where it warns you before you reply if somebody has replied with a post you haven't seen while typing yours.
Reality continues to ruin my life.

User avatar
Volvo B12BLEA
Posts: 4721
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:23 am
Favourite Vehicle: Rail and Ships / Boats.
Location: Brisbane but prefer Adelaide.

Post by Volvo B12BLEA »

Andrew wrote:What is an 'incident'?
This kind of incident...Fatal ones.
http://www.busaustralia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16551
Any posts are my views or opinions and are NOT on behalf of any Organisation.

User avatar
Wrong Way - Go Back
Posts: 642
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 3:07 am
Location: Little River

Post by Wrong Way - Go Back »

Oh, somebody died?
Then I guess no-one here should mention the war in Iraq, 9/11, the road toll, cancer, heart disease or the terminal stage of the cycle of life. Or is it only Queenslanders who are overly sensitive?
And by the way, while I am being cynical, I find the offer of condolences to someone you have never met and who will never receive the message to be rather twee.

Nexas
Posts: 2273
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:50 am
Location: Gone

Post by Nexas »

I think they are just upset because earlier in the day the checkout operator forgot to ask them for their fly-buys card. :cry:
Views expressed by me are strictly my own, not of my friends, employer, or anyone else.

User avatar
Ben O
Posts: 2516
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Ben O »

So what happens when there is an update on the situation and the topic is locked?

Stupid idea, next!

User avatar
Simes
Posts: 9063
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 1:09 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Mercedes Benz
Location: Grove of Kings
Contact:

Post by Simes »

The railpage policy is just too arbitary, it kills debate/discussion, I'm more of the belief that mods/admins should just keep an eye on those threads.

Common sense please....
http://19302413.blogspot.com/

3092, last bus on George Street - 23rd October 2015 7:50pm

User avatar
MAN_LOVER
Posts: 513
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 8:45 am
Location: Hell

Post by MAN_LOVER »

Wrong Way - Go Back wrote:Oh, somebody died?
Then I guess no-one here should mention the war in Iraq, 9/11, the road toll, cancer, heart disease or the terminal stage of the cycle of life. Or is it only Queenslanders who are overly sensitive?
And by the way, while I am being cynical, I find the offer of condolences to someone you have never met and who will never receive the message to be rather twee.
Fully agree :roll:

User avatar
Irisbus Rider
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:14 am
Favourite Vehicle: CC Mercedes Benz 0405
Location: Nth Canberra, ACT

Post by Irisbus Rider »

Yeah, crickey, a mountain out of a molehill here. Sure, its sad, and some thought must be given to that, but life (and posting) shouldn't stop because of it.
go-bus: The Metro Advantage

User avatar
mjja
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 2:03 am
Location: Mount Waverley, Melbourne
Contact:

Post by mjja »

Railpage's policy was formed because people were speculating too much about things like level crossing accidents. Some were saying "*** car drivers never stop when the booms are down" when they didn't know the facts. Some were saying "I heard the driver committed suicide after the K183 incident" which is incredibly damaging.

Some have said that it's too strict, but really, once the facts have been posted, what needs to be discussed? If there's anything which relates (eg a discussion about trees blocking the view of signals) then a new thread can be created and a link given to the locked thread if it's relevant.

And if there's an update, it's not all that difficult to ask a moderator to unlock it.
Happy Gunzelling and remember, "Go By Rail!"

Michael Angelico

User avatar
Ken
Posts: 2603
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 12:03 pm
Favourite Vehicle: MAN SL200
Location: Ammo room
Contact:

Post by Ken »

Simes wrote:I'm more of the belief that mods/admins should just keep an eye on those threads.
This is what has happened in the past and seems to work fine.

It is not often on this forum that such insensitive speculative comments are made, and when they are they are removed and posters reminded to stick to the facts and not speculate. Such speculation would already be catered for under existing board guidelines pertaining to incorrect/misleading information, inappropriate comments etc. I don't see the need for a specific new rule.

User avatar
Simes
Posts: 9063
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 1:09 pm
Favourite Vehicle: Mercedes Benz
Location: Grove of Kings
Contact:

Post by Simes »

Ken wrote:
Simes wrote:I'm more of the belief that mods/admins should just keep an eye on those threads.
This is what has happened in the past and seems to work fine.
I should of gone further with that and said "if it ain't broke, don't fix it..."
http://19302413.blogspot.com/

3092, last bus on George Street - 23rd October 2015 7:50pm

Post Reply

Return to “News & Administration”